[Snort-users] Necessary of http and other app protocol in rules header

Meridoff oagvozd at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 18:01:20 EDT 2019


Thank you.

пт, 28 июн. 2019 г. в 19:28, Al Lewis (allewi) <allewi at cisco.com>:

>
> https://snort-org-site.s3.amazonaws.com/production/document_files/files/000/000/141/original/Rules_Writers_Guide_to_Snort_3_Rules.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIXACIED2SPMSC7GA%2F20190628%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20190628T162714Z&X-Amz-Expires=172800&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=ea1b4e68710fd53e5aa1ff48e22718fed8c1e8e05d684224e7338e68ab35b92c
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Albert Lewis*
>
> ENGINEER.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
>
> Cisco Systems Inc.
>
> Email: allewi at cisco.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Snort-users <snort-users-bounces at lists.snort.org> on behalf of
> Meridoff via Snort-users <snort-users at lists.snort.org>
> *Reply-To: *Meridoff <oagvozd at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, June 28, 2019 at 12:18 PM
> *To: *"snort-users at lists.snort.org" <snort-users at lists.snort.org>
> *Subject: *[Snort-users] Necessary of http and other app protocol in
> rules header
>
>
>
> Hello, What reason to use "http" procotol in rule header?
>
> As I can see in code this App-level protocols are not processed at all
> -all of them considered as TCP protocols.  Only protos that are considered
> in rule processing are ip,tcp,udp and icmp.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20190629/15b8f217/attachment.html>


More information about the Snort-users mailing list