[Snort-users] Necessary of http and other app protocol in rules header
Al Lewis (allewi)
allewi at cisco.com
Fri Jun 28 12:28:03 EDT 2019
Cisco Systems Inc.
Email: allewi at cisco.com<mailto:allewi at cisco.com>
From: Snort-users <snort-users-bounces at lists.snort.org> on behalf of Meridoff via Snort-users <snort-users at lists.snort.org>
Reply-To: Meridoff <oagvozd at gmail.com>
Date: Friday, June 28, 2019 at 12:18 PM
To: "snort-users at lists.snort.org" <snort-users at lists.snort.org>
Subject: [Snort-users] Necessary of http and other app protocol in rules header
Hello, What reason to use "http" procotol in rule header?
As I can see in code this App-level protocols are not processed at all -all of them considered as TCP protocols. Only protos that are considered in rule processing are ip,tcp,udp and icmp.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users