[Snort-users] Necessary of http and other app protocol in rules header

Al Lewis (allewi) allewi at cisco.com
Fri Jun 28 12:28:03 EDT 2019


Albert Lewis
Cisco Systems Inc.
Email: allewi at cisco.com<mailto:allewi at cisco.com>

From: Snort-users <snort-users-bounces at lists.snort.org> on behalf of Meridoff via Snort-users <snort-users at lists.snort.org>
Reply-To: Meridoff <oagvozd at gmail.com>
Date: Friday, June 28, 2019 at 12:18 PM
To: "snort-users at lists.snort.org" <snort-users at lists.snort.org>
Subject: [Snort-users] Necessary of http and other app protocol in rules header

Hello, What reason to use "http" procotol in rule header?
As I can see in code this App-level protocols are not processed at all -all of them considered as TCP protocols.  Only protos that are considered in rule processing are ip,tcp,udp and icmp.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20190628/0894d116/attachment.html>

More information about the Snort-users mailing list