[Snort-users] how can improve detection of attack by snort 3

Joel Esler (jesler) jesler at cisco.com
Wed May 30 12:50:19 EDT 2018

Why don't you use the registered rule set for 3.0 to test with?

On May 30, 2018, at 6:07 AM, bz Os via Snort-users <snort-users at lists.snort.org<mailto:snort-users at lists.snort.org>> wrote:

hello evry one
   i am using snort 3 as ids i loaded snort3 comunity rules and i uncommented all commented rules and i loaded this rules in the configuration file ,when i run snort  3957
rules are loaded .
   i run snort against a part on darpa dataset but as results i had only 3 detection (  "(http_Inspect)header line terminated by LF without a CR " and  "(arp_spoof) unicast arp request " and "(ipv4)packet from reserved source address " in other hand  i runed suricata against the same pcap file as rusults suricata detected a lot of attack ,

   how can i add emerging threat to detect more attack by snort 3 or is there a method for improve the detection
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.snort.org<mailto:Snort-users at lists.snort.org>
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

Please follow these rules: https://snort.org/faq/what-is-the-mailing-list-etiquette

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20180530/760a4c96/attachment.html>

More information about the Snort-users mailing list