[Snort-users] http_inspect missing requests

James Lay jlay at ...13475...
Wed Feb 8 08:21:36 EST 2017


Wow did I hose my analysis of that 8-|  Totally didn't even look INSIDE
the actual packet...go me!!
On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 13:42 +0100, Felix Erlacher wrote:
> One packet resulting in 10 http GET requests is perfectly alright.
> Here,
> HTTP/1.1 pipelining is used, which enables 10 GET requests in one TCP
> segment.
> 
> greets
> 
> felix
> 
> On 08/02/17 13:04, James Lay wrote:
> > 
> > One packet should not equal 10 HTTP GET's....something is
> > amiss....I
> > think this might be a bug.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
> Snort-users list archive:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users
> 
> Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest
> Snort news!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20170208/d8d5c1a2/attachment.html>


More information about the Snort-users mailing list