[Snort-users] Trigger anomalies (on LXC container versus host)

waldo kitty wkitty42 at ...14940...
Mon May 4 06:31:43 EDT 2015

On 5/3/2015 8:07 PM, Chris wrote:
> Here's the rule that one would expect to trigger.
> test.cgi access"; flow:to_server,established; uricontent:"/test.cgi";
> nocase; classtype:web-application-activity; sid:1646; rev:5;)
> I'm left to think that I must be making a mistake somehow with my
> playback testing, but I'm not sure what. Any ideas?

your rule has flow:to_server,established in it... could it be that your 
container snort hasn't seen the previous 3-way handshake packets and so doesn't 
consider this packet as "established"? we've seen similar when snort has flushed 
"old" unprocessed packets to make room for new ones in a heavy flow, low memory, 
high cpu usage situation...

  NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
        Please *keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
        private contact is specifically requested and granted.

More information about the Snort-users mailing list