[Snort-users] Heartbleed Rule

Jefferson, Shawn Shawn.Jefferson at ...14448...
Fri Apr 11 15:54:40 EDT 2014


Thanks everyone!  Makes sense....


From: JJC [mailto:cummingsj at ...11827...]
Sent: April 10, 2014 5:09 PM
To: Jefferson, Shawn
Cc: Joel Esler (jesler); snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Heartbleed Rule

Beyond what Joel just responded with, if you are looking for internal-internal attacks often you will want your $EXTERNAL_NET variable defined as 'any'.  This would then make the rule direction that you noted effective even for inside -> inside traffic inspection.
JJC

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jefferson, Shawn <Shawn.Jefferson at ...14534......<mailto:Shawn.Jefferson at ...14448...>> wrote:
Any reason these rules are $EXTERNAL_NET -> $HOME_NET ?  Lot's of false positives otherwise, performance, or something else?

I was hoping to use them to detect potential internal network heartbleed attacks, but would have to re-write them to do that (never ideal).

Thanks
Shawn

From: Joel Esler (jesler) [mailto:jesler at ...589...<mailto:jesler at ...589...>]
Sent: April 09, 2014 3:55 AM
To: Nicholas Bogart
Cc: snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:snort-users at ...3783...net>
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Heartbleed Rule

Nick,

Might want to review the latest post on http://vrt-blog.snort.org.

--
Joel Esler
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:46, "Nicholas Bogart" <nickybzoss at ...11827...<mailto:nickybzoss at ...11827...>> wrote:
Boss asked me about creating a rule for the OpenSSL Heartbleed.  I asked him why not just go update all the servers.  He just stared at me.  So I am submitting to the community for review and comment the rule I drew up on this proof-of-concept exploit for the heartbleed vulnerability.
Exploit - https://gist.github.com/takeshixx/10107280
CVE - https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-0160
Heartbleed References -
http://threatpost.com/seriousness-of-openssl-heartbleed-bug-sets-in/105309
https://threatpost.com/openssl-fixes-tls-vulnerability/105300
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 443 (msg:"Attempted Heartbleed access exploitation for OpenSSL 1.0.1f and lower"; flow: to_server; content:"| 18 03 02 00 03 01 40 00 |"; reference:cve, CVE-2014-0160;)
NickyB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20140411/ae5cad5f/attachment.html>


More information about the Snort-users mailing list