[Snort-users] Poor performance with Snort 184.108.40.206 under OpenBSD 5.3
jesler at ...1935...
Thu Jun 20 16:35:40 EDT 2013
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Markus Lude <markus.lude at ...348...> wrote:
> Speaking of far behind: the only OpenBSD release for which the so_rules
> from VRT come precomiled is one which isn't supported for more than 2
> years now.
We'll take a look at that.
>> Keeping the package maintainers up to date has helped a bit I see
>> things being updated more.
> IMO things that would help:
> - support snort releases for at least 6 months, better 9 or 12? With
> support I mean make up-to-date rules available for them.
Our EOL policy is here: http://www.snort.org/vrt/rules/eol_policy for those that don't know. That being said, we usually the highest patch in a thread for a year. For example, we released 220.127.116.11 in August of 2012. We'll be supporting it into September of this year.
> As mentioned above you see how hard it is for you to keep up even
> with releases each 6 months.
We aren't going to stop updating the IDS. We get yelled at if we do update, and we get yelled at if we don't.
> - help maintainers to get their packages tested. Test reports are rare.
> At least there aren't those different output plugins / backend any
> more to test. That was quite a lot, especially with multiple archs.
What can we provide?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users