[Snort-users] Cisco Sourcefire
michal at ...16244...
Tue Jul 23 12:00:19 EDT 2013
On 7/23/13 5:46 PM, Peter Bates wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello all
> On 23/07/2013 16:28, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> What for the future or snort?
> I was thinking along the same lines when I saw the announcement.
> Cisco have a history of swallowing security vendors and the
> products disappearing.
> Although this is probably not that different from the failed
> acquisition by Checkpoint back in the day?
> In this particular case I think Cisco are making up for the lack
> of having any innovative security products (particularly IPS).
> The development of Snort would still be governed by the open source
> licence in use, though, surely?
Sure, and so is Solaris...
More information about the Snort-users