[Snort-users] Snort, Barnyard2 and Snorby alert classification mismatch
hanxhi at ...6283...
Wed Jan 16 09:52:23 EST 2013
Thanks elz, that worked like a charm.
Everyday I learn something new, that's why I like my job.
De: beenph <beenph at ...11827...>
Para: hanx hi <hanxhi at ...6283...>
CC: "snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net" <snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Enviado: miércoles, 16 de enero de 2013 10:40
Asunto: Re: [Snort-users] Snort, Barnyard2 and Snorby alert classification mismatch
Forgot to say that you could also update the priority manually with a
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:37 AM, beenph <beenph at ...11827...> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:14 AM, hanx hi <hanxhi at ...6283...> wrote:
>> Hi everyone, I have this issue, maybe someone can help.
>> I'm running Snort 2.9.4 along with Barnyard2 2.1.9 and Snorby 2.5.4 as a
>> frontend. My problems is
>> that I cannot match any snort rule classification with Snorby severity.
> Hi Hanx Hi,
> First i would suggest that you update to latest barnyard2
>> For example, I have this rule in Snort:
>> alert tcp $HOME_NET 21 -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"POLICY failed FTP login
>> attempt"; flow:established,to_client; content:"530 "; depth:4;
>> metadata:policy security-ips alert;
>> reference:url,www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0959.txt; sid:13360; rev:3; priority:10;)
>> As you can see, at the end of a line I assign a priority of 10 to that rule;
>> when I trigger
> You changed the priority, for it to be set correctly you would need to delete
> the rule you have inserted in the database and re-run barnyard2.
> The rule would then be at the good priority (if you have changed it
> betwen the first insertion
> and a later insertion).
> Hope this helps,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users