[Snort-users] Snort.conf 2.9.4

Joel Esler jesler at ...1935...
Wed Dec 5 09:08:36 EST 2012

It all has to do with the way the tar ball is built when it's prepped for package.  I'll investigate the process and see what we can do here.

Joel Esler
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager

On Dec 5, 2012, at 9:05 AM, "Weir, Jason" <jason.weir at ...14916...> wrote:

> Joel or Nigel or anyone really..
> was just released - how can the snort.conf included in the
> tarball and the one available at labs.snort.org be different already?
> I could understand going forward updates would be made to the one
> available at labs.snorg.org and using that one would make the most sense
> but saying "here is the tarball but don't use the included snort.conf"
> doesn't make sense to me..
> What's the rationale behind what you're doing here???
> Thanks,
> Jason
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joel Esler [mailto:jesler at ...1935...]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:34 PM
>> To: Nigel Houghton
>> Cc: Michael Steele; snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Snort.conf 2.9.4
>> Also, no. You probably shouldn't use the snort.conf that ships with
> the
>> tarball.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20121205/0ff5cebe/attachment.html>

More information about the Snort-users mailing list