[Snort-users] Malware Sigs Plus Vuln Sigs or Vuln Sigs Only
NolanTim at ...15141...
Thu Feb 3 10:09:16 EST 2011
I typically do not post much online. It is amusing to watch the ranting and frothing and poking that go on in some of these forums, and picking out the good bits of useful info (eating the watermelon and spitting out the seeds).
In my opinion Matt Jonkman is right in his general premise, and many of those who resist adding malware sigs/rules and the like perhaps don't even really know what they are missing.
In my opinion, the way forward is more signatures, more reputation feeds, and more threat intelligence aimed at both the detective and protective side of the equation. As long as it is timely and accurate, we will be enabled to do our jobs better, more proactively, and with a shorter interval between infection and effective response, and less systems will be infected as a result.
Thanks Joel and Matt for your entertaining exchange of helpful information, etc.. You guys rock and are both moving the ball down the field in the right direction and doing awesome things to help the security community. Keep up the good work.
Timothy J. Nolan
BABT Enterprise Information Security
Bridgestone Americas, Inc.
535 Marriott Drive, 4th Floor
Nashville, TN 37214
office: (615) 937-6059
fax: (615) 937-6133
nolantim at ...15141...<mailto:nolantim at ...15141...>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users