[Snort-users] snort 220.127.116.11 flexresp3 and active-response
michael.scheidell at ...8144...
Wed Feb 2 20:31:56 EST 2011
On 2/2/11 12:52 PM, Russ Combs wrote:
> is there any reason to enable one without the other?
> it appears to me that you would want both or none.
> That makes sense to me. And neither will generate responses without
> additional configuration so no harm done.
I suppose one option would be to enable flexresp3 so that resp: rules
and sensitve data rules don't error out, but only enable active response
if user wants it.
the challenge to ports/rpm maintainers is to select the most USEFUL and
common options. sure, savvy users can edit the Makefile and add in
their own config options. but most don't./
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users