[Snort-users] Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule
michael.scheidell at ...8144...
Tue Feb 1 14:35:33 EST 2011
On 2/1/11 1:56 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
> That's not right. I'll bug this on our side for our developers to
> take a look.
Would you consider it a bug to fail on a signal 30, if system build with
targetbased, and doesn't have a targets.xml file?
You might ask, why send a signal 30 to reload the targets.xml file if
you don't have system compiled with --enable-targetbased?
(freebsd sends a signal 30 is you send it a SIGUSR1)
I might ask, if --enable-targetbased is NOT specified, why include the
code to look for the targets.xml file?
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users