[Snort-users] bug - "2.8.6" should be "2.8.6.0"

Jason Haar Jason.Haar at ...294...
Thu May 27 19:44:35 EDT 2010


says it all really. Why have the rulefiles referring to 2860 as their
version number when "snort -V" returns "2.8.6"?

I'm having to edit our downloading script to bang "0" on the end of the
URL and ".0" on the end of the check for so_rules due to this
inconsistency. Nothing major but certainly an annoyance :-)

So I guess I'm saying that you've standardized on a 4 digit "version
number" for some parts of snort, but drop the 4th digit when it's "0" in
other parts.

Thanks!

-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1





More information about the Snort-users mailing list