[Snort-users] Which OS to choose for SNORT? (need help)

firnsy firnsy at ...14568...
Fri Jan 8 06:36:04 EST 2010


On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 21:03 -0500, Randal T. Rioux wrote:
> I'm not touching this one...
> 
> Firnsy? :-)
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> On Thu, January 7, 2010 8:52 pm, Joel Esler wrote:
> > Barnyard is pretty much done in it's current iteration.  I'd ask the same
> > question to the barnyard2 guys, which seems to be much more current.
> >
> > J
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Michael Steele
> > <michaels at ...9077...>wrote:
> >
> >>  Speaking of barnyard and Windows. Is there a reason why Barnyard has
> >> yet
> >> to be ported to Windows?
> >>
> >>

Haha ... I can't afford MS VS *TIC*

FWIW, it doesn't have that high a priority at the moment until
event/packet caching is in place.

Regards,

-- 
firnsy
www.securixlive.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20100108/5dbce15e/attachment.sig>


More information about the Snort-users mailing list