[Snort-users] Another early morning fatal warning

Richard Bejtlich taosecurity at ...11827...
Mon May 4 11:37:17 EDT 2009


On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Matt Olney <molney at ...1935...> wrote:
> Damn Mondays:
>
> "Yes, the published rules are >>NOW<< 2.8.4. specific."
>
> Matt
>

Is it just me, or should 2.8.4 have been 2.9 instead?

Why does a sub-minor version (major.minor.sub-minor) contain so much
new functionality (specifically thinking SMB here)?

I know -- it's free; if you don't like it, tough, etc.  :)

Still, moving to 2.9 would have made it clearer to users and saved
some support time, I think.

Thank you,

Richard




More information about the Snort-users mailing list