[Snort-users] Deployment Sizes? was: anyone trying kickfire to improve SQL performance?
Jason.Haar at ...294...
Sat May 3 17:13:54 EDT 2008
Stewart L wrote:
> Well, I wasn't in charge of the deployment. I handed it off to one of
> the guys on my team to do the research and recommendations.
> Part of the problem is that there is no SOLID advice out there on how
> to set up and tweak a lot of this stuff. We have the oreilly books
> and have done some searches, but there is a lot of hand waving and not
> a lot of solid answers.
There are too many variables for there to be a "one size fits all"
answer. That's why companies like SourceFire exist - they do all that
background 'thinking' for you and produce a product that 'just works'.
You should check the solution you have actually works. 6-16 100Mbs
Ethernet monitors on one box is probably too many. Unless you've
cherry-picked the motherboard,Ethernet cards, etc. And I'm assuming
they're 100M - if they are Gb - you almost certainly have a problem.
> So, you're saying that if I were to have another machine do the actual
> capture and a separate database machine, I'd be better off in the long
> haul? That should be pretty easy to set up.
Yup - you won't get all the hard SQL work interfering with the hard
packet sniffing work. And barnyard of course instead of native SQL support.
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
More information about the Snort-users