[Snort-users] New revs? of old sigs causing Snort to die

Paul Melson pmelson at ...11827...
Sun Oct 21 17:31:24 EDT 2007


Starting Friday I noticed the following problems with the following signatures.

The following rules start with 'alert udp' and contain flow: statements.

634,635,636,637,2004

I'm using Snort 2.7.0.1 on RHEL4 and it's complaining and refusing to
run until these rules are commented out.

Also, the following rules are using a comma-delimited list of ports,
which is causing Snort to barf:

12635,12642

What's up?

PaulM




More information about the Snort-users mailing list