[Snort-users] (no subject)

Jeff Nathan jeff at ...950...
Wed Oct 11 00:17:52 EDT 2006

On Oct 6, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Randal T. Rioux wrote:

> Martin Roesch wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure they should be good sensors, Apple seems to emphasize
>> IO bandwidth in their designs typically and with the Core Duo CPUs
>> they've got a ton of horsepower.
>> FWIW, I do all my Snort development on Macs these days. :)
>> Hm, maybe I need to get myself a nice Mac Pro so I can do some x86
>> benchmarks....
> Oh Marty... say it ain't so!
> x86 is for the weak. I will give you a SPARC, PA-RISC or SGI MIPS  
> box if
> it helps get you away from those horrible machines :-)
> Randy

Free computers as in "never been fired and only dropped once" ?

Just say NO to a portability (as in unix portability) lab in your  
home. :)


Custom packets with little to no money down.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20061011/aead407c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20061011/aead407c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Snort-users mailing list