[Snort-users] Serious Snort Bug Could Lead To Next Slammer

Patrick Harper patrick at ...4250...
Thu Oct 20 05:41:21 EDT 2005


http://www.snort.org/rules/advisories/snort_update_20051018.html

Fixes and Mitigation Instructions Available for Snort Back Orifice
Vulnerability  	Jennifer Steffens (Sourcefire) @ October 18, 2005 09:18:01

There is a link on the front page and on the news page


 
-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Michael Steele
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 6:39 AM
To: snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Snort-users] Serious Snort Bug Could Lead To Next Slammer

I found this:

http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/dailyarchives.jhtml?articleId=17230
2520

No mention on Snort.org or in the list.

Kindest regards,
Michael...

WINSNORT.com Management Team Member
--
Pick up your FREE Windows or UNIX Snort installation guides
mailto:support at ...9077...
Website: http://www.winsnort.com
Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org
-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Igor Belikov
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 12:18 AM
To: snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re[2]: [Snort-users] need help configuring snort + barnyard

Hello Chris,

Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 7:31:05 PM, you wrote:

CE> |   I configured snort to write both alert and log files in unified
CE> |   format. But I can't configure barnyard properly to store in DB
CE> |   detailed info about alerts.
CE> | 
CE> |   Barnyard "watch" alert files and stores info about alerts, but I
CE> |   need also store whole packets caused alert.

CE> It seems you don't need to have snort write both unified files.  All the
CE> required info seems to be in the unified "log" file, so this is what you
CE> want barnyard to read.  It's not at all clear to us what info is in the
CE> unified "alert" file that's not *also* in the unified "log" file.  So we
CE> don't write a unified "alert" file at all.

It's sounds good, but I still can't configure snort + barnyard.

Last configs:

  - snort:

output log_unified: filename snort.log, limit 128

  - barnyard:

output log_acid_db: mysql, sensor_id 1, database snort, server x.x.x.x, user
xxxxx, password xxxxx, detail full

In /log directory I see "snort.log.<timestamp>", "barnyard.waldo"
(with correct link to snort.log) and "alert" (with alerts produced by
snort).

Watching log files I see that barnyard works (link in waldo file
follows growing snort.log), but I don't get any new alerts in DB.

Using previous variant of configs (using unified alert) barnyard put
all alerts in DB.

Please, point me where I make mistake.

-- 
Best regards,
 Igor                            mailto:ivb at ...13431...



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users







-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users






More information about the Snort-users mailing list