[Snort-users] Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort
theodorestout at ...131...
Tue Oct 11 07:00:50 EDT 2005
Let's just trust Marty on this one. He has been right
up until now so why doubt him at this point?
Even though I have had some serious doubts about this,
all in all, Sourcefire and Checkpoint will become
better because of this and somewhere, someplace, the
Pig will be stronger. I suspose we all just have to
get used to such a large company being involved with
Sourcefire. It is for the best. Wayne, Tom, and
Marty have made the right decision.
I doubt that Checkpoint will negatively affect Snort
development and yes Interspect could use a bit more
intergration with Snort rules.
--- SN ORT <snort_on_acid at ...131...> wrote:
> Soo....Two opposing views, who will be right? Time
> will tell my friends!
> --- Paul Melson <pmelson at ...11827...> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Checkpoint Acquisition
> > and the future of Open
> > Source Snort
> > > Oh pullleeeze! I predict that Snort will be gone
> > very soon. Let's seeeeee,
> > a corporate
> > > "competitor" buys up an open-source and FREE
> > competitor, and things will
> > remain the
> > > same? Everything will continue to be free and
> > people will continue to
> > develop for it?
> > > Uh-huh.
> > >
> > > You know, I actually wouldn't mind paying a bit
> > for Snort, but mostly
> > because it is/was
> > > a "grassroots program". We support the
> > open-sourced communities. I mean,
> > open-source is
> > > all about alternatives, ingenuity and a sort of
> > 'family'. Well folks, that
> > is now
> > > history. I believe Snort has now been 'sold
> > >
> > > The smartest thing for us to do is start looking
> > for an alternative.
> > >
> > > And open-source developers need to start
> > a newer and better
> > system, if you're
> > > a developer and want some fame and recognition,
> > talk to me! I am no
> > developer, but I
> > > know enough about just about everything IT, and
> > even some programming
> > skills, and would
> > > be glad to help. Now is the time to start!
> > You say the sky is falling on Snort, but I doubt
> > for a number of reasons.
> > 1. The GPL will minimally allow the ongoing use
> > development of Snort
> > 2.4.x regardless of what Check Point wants to do.
> > 2. Snort is a well-known brand in the IDS market -
> > that's value Check Point
> > would be foolish to throw away or relinquish
> > of by dismantling its
> > open source engine.
> > 3. Check Point has not shown itself to be a
> > that buys up competition
> > in order to kill it (with one notable exception -
> > still maintain that they
> > bought Zone to keep Cisco from buying them and
> > Integrity to compete
> > with SecureClient, but that's another story.)
> > 4. Sourcefire is more than just Snort. NIDS is an
> > established market, and
> > though Snort is a standard player, it would make
> > more sense to me that Check
> > Point might be pursuing some of the more leading
> > edge stuff Sourcefire
> > offers, such as RNA and Defense Center. (And
> > between you and me, Check
> > Point would do well to sell the Sourcefire
> > appliances instead of their own
> > starting immediately - InterSpect is a lousy
> > and most people know
> > it.)
> > Just my $0.02, but this is much ado about very
> > little.
> > PaulM
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content,
> downloads, discussions,
> and more.
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Go to this URL to change user options or
> Snort-users list archive:
More information about the Snort-users