[Snort-users] packet loss

Marc Norton marc.norton at ...1935...
Wed Sep 29 08:18:10 EDT 2004

If you have plenty of cpu and  memory I am assuming you are not page
faulting, in which case you might just need to use the mmap version of
libpcap. It uses less cpu than the standard pcap, but also has much less
packet latency during sniffing so it does not drop as much.
-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Larry
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 10:14 AM
To: snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Snort-users] packet loss
In the course of my testing of Snort I have averaged about 40% packet
loss. I am running Snort on Fedora. The segment I am monitoring is 100
mb and is very busy. Does anyone have any recommendations for tuning
Snort to not drop so many packets? Is there any recommendations for
hardware? The CPU is running at about 40% and the memory looks fine. 

Do you Yahoo!?
/new_mail/static/efficiency.html>  Mail - 50x more storage than other
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20040929/a2fb4d8c/attachment.html>

More information about the Snort-users mailing list