frank at ...9761...
Mon Feb 16 14:51:06 EST 2004
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 16:23, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I would like to add a caution to this. If you are going to use clamav, do
> not depend on it as your only gateway defense. Use it as part of a more
> complete strategy. Recent testing by an authoritative source shows that
> clamav only catches about 50% of the in-the-wild viruses. (This is really
> off topic for snort, so if you want to discuss the details, email me off
Uhm, I'm not sure about that, Paul. I've heard from folks that caught
new viruses with Clamav before Norton got it. Matter the fact, just
recently there was a posting somewhere (I'm sure you've seen that since
you are on most lists) that showed that clamav had a signature for it
I have nothing but pleasant experience with clamav. I can't believe how
well it works for being OpenSource.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Snort-users