[Snort-users] UPDATE: flexresp2 (new and improved active response for Snort)
jeff at ...950...
Thu Sep 4 11:28:19 EDT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 08:00 AM, jon baer wrote:
> just as a general off the wall question ... is there a reason why
> 1.1.x is not used w/ flexresp2? are there disadvantages?
> - jon
Very little of libnet is actually used inside flexresp and flexresp2.
Ideally, flexresp2 would work with libnet-1.0.2a, libnet-1.1.x and
Libnet-1.0.2a is used because it's lightweight, provides the needed
functionality and I'm intimately familiar with it (oh, and the original
author of flexrexp used it as well).
http://cerberus.sourcefire.com/~jeff (gpg key available)
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age
eighteen." - Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Snort-users