[Snort-users] 1.9.1 versus 2.0.x

John Sage jsage at ...2022...
Tue May 27 13:01:03 EDT 2003

A long, long time ago in a galaxy far...

/* No, wait, that's not right */

Several weeks ago Erek posted something that suggested that 2.0.x has
a considerably bigger memory footprint than 1.9.1 and that if one was
running low-end hardware, 2.0.x might not be happy.

Given: Pentium 150 classic, 96mb RAM, Linux 2.4-18.5, no X, go with
snort 1.9.1 or 2.0.x?

What say ye?

- John
"You are in a twisty maze of weblogs, all alike."

    PGP key: http://www.finchhaven.com/pages/gpg_pubkey.html
Fingerprint: C493 9F26 05A9 6497 9800 4EF6 5FC8 F23D 35A4 F705

More information about the Snort-users mailing list