[Snort-users] Is this a valid rule?

Alberto Gonzalez ag-snort at ...7149...
Thu Oct 24 20:34:02 EDT 2002


and IRC ports (for most servers I've seen) 6667 not 6008

Lefevre, Steven wrote:

>I have this rule in my local rule file:
>
>alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 6008:6009 (msg:"IRC Activity")
>
>(It's to detect IRC traffic ;)
>
>Why does snort always choke on it? I've looked it over 100 times and it
>seems to follow the syntax.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
>of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
>Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
>http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
>_______________________________________________
>Snort-users mailing list
>Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
>Snort-users list archive:
>http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
>
>  
>

-- 
The secret to success is to start from scratch and keep on scratching.






More information about the Snort-users mailing list