[Snort-users] Tap -> Hub Problem.
larosa_vjay at ...3331...
Mon May 6 14:15:03 EDT 2002
Problem solved. The people that own the link already had it forced to 100
full, I was at 100 half.
Sorry to waste everyones time.
From: larosa, vjay
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 5:01 PM
To: 'snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Tap -> Hub Problem.
The tap is in line with an autnegotiating link. I figured since the data was
being transmitted to the hub that a 100 MB half duplex hub would be O.Kay.
I also tried setting the cisco switch to auto/auto and still go the same
I don't own the link and they won't force to 100MB Full so I am not sure
what else to try. Any other ideas?
From: Chris Green [mailto:cmg at ...1935...]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM
To: larosa, vjay
Cc: 'snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Tap -> Hub Problem.
"larosa, vjay" <larosa_vjay at ...3331...> writes:
> I need to ask for some advice. I have a situation where there is a century
> tap installed that splits my link in to
> two pieces. Send and Recieve. When I plug these two connections in to any
> sort of hub, or switch with port mirroring
> (Tried a NetGear DS108 and a Cisco 3500) I get approximately a %50 error
> rate according to my network analyzer.
> When I run either or connection alone, I do not get any errors. Does
> have any idea why this might be
> happening? Thanks!
Full Duplex ethernet going into a half duplex hole.
You'll have to bump your switch down to 100half duplex.
Chris Green <cmg at ...1935...>
This is my signature. There are many like it but this one is mine.
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth at ...382...
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
Snort-users list archive:
More information about the Snort-users