[Snort-users] WEB-MISC readme.eml attempt
cpw at ...440...
Mon Mar 11 20:49:07 EST 2002
Let us know when you figure it out.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 06:48:55PM -0500, Basil Saragoza wrote:
> I have local sensor that sniffs lan nic of the firewall. I see a couple of
> entries to the workstations (w2k with IIS5) and it says - WEB-MISC
> readme.eml attempt .
Not a lot of content here. I'd include the rule if I wanted help:
% grep "readme.eml attempt" web-misc.rules
web-misc.rules:alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET 80 -> $HOME_NET any (msg: "WEB-MISC readme.eml attempt"; flags:A+; uricontent: "readme.eml"; nocase; classtype: attempted-user; sid:1284; rev:3; reference: url,www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-26.html;)
Now, with the rule what would you do? What kind of information is available
to help you figure out why the rule triggered:
1. The content is coming back to a user within the network you are protecting
with your firewall. Presumably it will get through because it is a
normal result of a web query from one of your users.
Of course you could prevent this kind of thing with your firewall by
preventing your users access to http (port 80).
2. TCP flags indicate that it is most likely a data packet (the SYN/ACK could
contain data, but we should send all those packets to Bill).
3. Hmmm, there is a sid:1284. Opps no help there. The explanation is a bit
short. Waiting for someone on the snort list to help out.
4. Oh, look a "reference"! Let's see what the CERT advisory says.
It's a tad long, but boy does it have a lot of nifty url's where you can
learn even more. I started scanning it and found in the Overview. The
*** from web server to client via browsing of compromised web sites ***
Sounds like your boy.
So, as usual, you are on your own.
PS: Rather than leave it at that, I'll append what I saw on the web in ascii.
Search for "r.adm...ml" where . is a wildcard character.
CERT® Advisory CA-2001-26 Nimda Worm
Original release date: September 18, 2001
Revised: September 25, 2001
A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
Systems running Microsoft Windows 95, 98, ME, NT, and 2000
(good old Bill)
The CERT/CC has received reports of new malicious code known as the "W32/Nimda worm" or the "Concept Virus (CV) v.5." This new
worm appears to spread by multiple mechanisms:
from client to client via email
from client to client via open network shares
*** from web server to client via browsing of compromised web sites ***
from client to web server via active scanning for and exploitation of various Microsoft IIS 4.0 / 5.0 directory traversal
vulnerabilities (VU#111677 and CA-2001-12)
from client to web server via scanning for the back doors left behind by the "Code Red II" (IN-2001-09), and "sadmind/IIS"
The worm modifies web documents (e.g., .htm, .html, and .asp files) and certain executable files found on the systems it infects, and
creates numerous copies of itself under various file names.
We have also received reports of denial of service as a result of network scanning and email propagation.
The Nimda worm has the potential to affect both user workstations (clients) running Windows 95, 98, ME, NT, or 2000 and servers
running Windows NT and 2000.
This worm propagates through email arriving as a MIME "multipart/alternative" message consisting of two sections. The first section is
defined as MIME type "text/html", but it contains no text, so the email appears to have no content. The second section is defined as
MIME type "audio/x-wav", but it contains a base64-encoded attachment named "readme.exe", which is a binary executable.
Due to a vulnerability described in CA-2001-06 (Automatic Execution of Embedded MIME Types), any mail software running on an x86
platform that uses Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 SP1 or earlier (except IE 5.01 SP2) to render the HTML mail automatically runs the
enclosed attachment and, as result, infects the machine with the worm. Thus, in vulnerable configurations, the worm payload will
automatically be triggered by simply opening (or previewing) this mail message. As an executable binary, the payload can also be triggered
by simply running the attachment.
The email message delivering the Nimda worm appears to also have the following characteristics:
The text in the subject line of the mail message appears to be variable.
There appear to be many slight variations in the attached binary file, causing the MD5 checksum to be different when one
compares different attachments from different email messages. However, the file length of the attachment appears to
consistently be 57344 bytes.
The worm also contains code that will attempt to resend the infected email messages every 10 days.
The email addresses targeted for receiving the worm are harvested from two sources
the .htm and .html files in the user's web cache folder
the contents of the user's email messages retrieved via the MAPI service
These files are passed through a simple pattern matcher which collects strings that look like email addresses. These addresses then receive
a copy of the worm as a MIME-encoded email attachment. Nimda stores the time the last batch of emails were sent in the Windows
registry, and every 10 days will repeat the process of harvesting addresses and sending the worm via email.
Likewise, the client machines begin scanning for vulnerable IIS servers. Nimda looks for backdoors left by previous IIS worms: Code Red
II [IN-2001-09] and sadmind/IIS worm [CA-2001-11]. It also attempts to exploit various IIS Directory Traversal vulnerabilities
(VU#111677 and CA-2001-12). The selection of potential target IP addresses follows these rough probabilities:
50% of the time, an address with the same first two octets will be chosen
25% of the time, an address with the same first octet will be chosen
25% of the time, a random address will be chosen
The infected client machine attempts to transfer a copy of the Nimda code via tftp (69/UDP) to any IIS server that it scans and finds to
Once running on the server machine, the worm traverses each directory in the system (including all those accessible through file shares)
and writes a MIME-encoded copy of itself to disk using file names with .eml or .nws extensions (e.g., readme.eml). When a directory
*** Damn it's a gif file! I wonder why ***
window.open ("r3adm3.3ml", null, "resizable=no,top=6000,left=t000")
*** Oh, yea I might trigger a rule somewhere in some virus checker.
This modification of web content allows further propagation of the worm to new clients through a web browser or through the browsing
of a network file system.
In order to further expose the machine, the worm
enables the sharing of the c: drive as C$
creates a "Guest" account on Windows NT and 2000 systems
adds this account to the "Administrator" group.
Furthermore, the Nimda worm infects existing binaries on the system by creating Trojan horse copies of legitimate applications. These
Trojan horse versions of the applications will first execute the Nimda code (further infecting the system and potentially propagating the
worm), and then complete their intended function.
As part of the infection process, the Nimda worm modifies all web content files it finds (including, but not limited to, files with .htm, .html,
and .asp extensions). As a result, any user browsing web content on the system, whether via the file system or via a web server, may
download a copy of the worm. Some browsers may automatically execute the downloaded copy, thereby infecting the browsing system.
File System Propagation
The Nimda worm creates numerous MIME-encoded copies of itself (using file names with .eml and .nws extensions) in all writable
directories (including those found on a network share) to which the user has access. If a user on another system subsequently selects the
copy of the worm file on the shared network drive in Windows Explorer with the preview option enabled, the worm may be able to
compromise that system.
Additionally, by creating Trojan horse versions of legitimate applications already installed on the system, users may unknowingly trigger the
worm when attempting to make use of these programs.
The scanning activity of the Nimda worm produces the following log entries for any web server listing on port 80/tcp:
Note: The first four entries in these sample logs denote attempts to connect to the backdoor left by Code Red II, while the remaining log
entries are examples of exploit attempts for the Directory Traversal vulnerability.
Intruders can execute arbitrary commands within the LocalSystem security context on machines running the unpatched versions of IIS. In
the case where a client is compromised, the worm will be run with the same privileges as the user who triggered it. Hosts that have been
compromised are also at high risk for being party to attacks on other Internet sites.
The high scanning rate of the Nimda worm may also cause bandwidth denial-of-service conditions on networks with infected machines.
Recommendations for System Administrators of IIS machines
To determine if your system has been compromised, look for the following:
a root.exe file (indicates a compromise by Code Red II or sadmind/IIS worms making the system vulnerable to the Nimda worm)
an Admin.dll file in the root directory of c:\, d:\, or e:\ (Note that the file name Admin.dll may be legitimately installed by IIS in
unexpected .eml or .nws files in numerous directories
the presence of this string: /c+tftp%20-i%20x.x.x.x%20GET%20Admin.dll%20d:\Admin.dll 200 in the IIS
logs, where "x.x.x.x" is the IP address of the attacking system. (Note that only the "200" result code indicates success of this
The only safe way to recover from the system compromise is to format the system drive(s) and reinstall the system software from trusted
media (such as vendor-supplied CD-ROM). Additionally, after the software is reinstalled, all vendor-supplied security patches must be
applied. The recommended time to do this is while the system is not connected to any network. However, if sufficient care is taken to
disable all server network services, then the patches can be downloaded from the Internet.
Detailed instructions for recovering your system can be found in the CERT/CC tech tip:
Steps for Recovering from a UNIX or NT System Compromise
Apply the appropriate patch from your vendor
A cumulative patch which addresses all of the IIS-related vulnerabilities exploited by the Nimda worm is available from Microsoft at
Recommendations for Network Administrators
Ingress filtering manages the flow of traffic as it enters a network under your administrative control. Servers are typically the only
machines that need to accept inbound connections from the public Internet. In the network usage policy of many sites, there are few
reasons for external hosts to initiate inbound connections to machines that provide no public services. Thus, ingress filtering should be
performed at the border to prohibit externally initiated inbound connections to non-authortized services. With Nimda, ingress filtering of
port 80/tcp could prevent instances of the worm outside of your network from scanning or infecting vulnerable IIS servers in the local
network that are not explicitly authorized to provide public web services. Filtering of port 69/udp will also prevent the downloading of the
worm to IIS via tftp.
Cisco has published a tech tip specifically addressing filtering guidelines to mitigate the impact of the Nimda worm at
Egress filtering manages the flow of traffic as it leaves a network under your administrative control. There is typically limited need for
machines providing public services to initiate outbound connections to the Internet. In the case of Nimda, employing egress filtering on
port 69/udp at your network border will prevent certain aspects of the worms propogation both to and from your network.
Recommendations for End User Systems
Apply the appropriate patch from your vendor
If you are running a vulnerable version of Internet Explorer (IE), the CERT/CC recommends upgrading to at least version 5.0 since older
versions are no longer officially maintained by Microsoft. Users of IE 5.0 and above are encourage to apply patch for the "Automatic
Execution of Embedded MIME Types" vulnerability available from Microsoft at
Note: IE 5.5 SP1 users should apply the patches discussed in MS01-027
Run and Maintain an Anti-Virus Product
It is important for users to update their anti-virus software. Most anti-virus software vendors have released updated information, tools,
or virus databases to help detect and partially recover from this malicious code. A list of vendor-specific anti-virus information can be
found in Appendix A.
Many anti-virus packages support automatic updates of virus definitions. We recommend using these automatic updates when available.
Don't open e-mail attachments
The Nimda worm may arrive as an email attachment named "readme.exe". Users should not open this attachment.
End-user systems can become infected with the Nimda worm by browsing web sites hosted by infected servers. This method of infection
appropriate patches have been applied and anti-virus software has been updated.
Appendix A. Vendor Information
Antivirus Vendor Information
Aladdin Knowledge Systems
Central Command, Inc.
Command Software Systems
You may wish to visit the CERT/CC's computer virus resources page located at
> Is it an indication that:
> 1. Someone on this workstation tried to access infected site on the internet
> 2. or that upload was attempted from internet to local workstation to infect
> Should I worry about it or it is just an informational alert?
> Workstations run only ftp part of the iis, not the web.
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> Snort-users list archive:
Phil Wood, cpw at ...440...
More information about the Snort-users