[Snort-users] My Webservers Are Showing Up In My Alerts
mkettler at ...4108...
Thu Jun 13 15:37:02 EDT 2002
Ahh you're probably getting "SCAN Proxy Attempt" alerts, since port
8080 (along with 1080) often used for socks proxy servers.
Snort's default ruleset assumes any attempt to connect to port 8080 is
someone scanning for proxy servers to abuse.
go into scan.rules and comment out this rule:
alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 8080 (msg:"SCAN Proxy
attempt";flags:S; classtype:attempted-recon; sid:620; rev:1;)
and that should quiet your alerts.
At 10:26 PM 6/13/2002 +0000, Vadim Pushkin wrote:
>Hi and thank you,
>They are merely access to my port 8080, not breakins at
>all. Perhaps they are percived this way due to my port
>change? I do not know. My servers listen on port 8080
>and the users are legit, mostly internal.
>>From: Matt Kettler <mkettler at ...4108...>
>>To: "Vadim Pushkin" <wiskbroom at ...125...>,
>>snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: Re: [Snort-users] My Webservers Are Showing Up In My Alerts
>>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:34:34 -0400
>>Well, that's not surprising.. A lot of the alerts you see are likely to
>>things like codered, IIS cmd.exe and other such things, directory
>>These usually represent actual attack attempt on your webserver. It is
>>usually being done by a virus or an automated tool. It's not uncommon for a
>>webserver to see dozens of these a day. The net is a brutal place, and it's
>>not uncommon to see a network block have exploit attempts hundreds of times
>>per day. Particularly if snort is watching unfiltered traffic in front of
>>My best recommendation is that if the alerts bother you, and you KNOW that
>>your webserver cannot possibly be vulnerable, comment out the rule in the
>>.rules file. (for example, if all your webservers are BSD or Linux Apache
>>webservers it's pretty safe to comment out the cmd.exe rule).
>>It is important to note however that they aren't false alerts, they are
>>usually genuine attempts to penetrate your webserver to run malicious code.
>>Snort takes the stand of having alerts for attempts, even if they were not
>>successful, because most events that do result in a real compromise are
>>"noisy" in that they have a lot of failed attempts preceding the one that
>>At 07:18 PM 6/13/2002 +0000, Vadim Pushkin wrote:
>>>My snort.conf has the following entries:
>>># Above is all on one line
>>>var HTTP_SERVERS_PORT 8080
>>>Several of my rules have port 80 replaced with $HTTP_SERVERS_PORT.
>>>I am getting ALOT of alerts for these as either source or dest.
>>>How can I prevent this?
>>>Thank you kindly,
>>>Vadim (Ukranian Stallion) Pushkin
>>>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>>>Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
>>>August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
>>>Snort-users mailing list
>>>Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
>>>Snort-users list archive:
>Vadim (Ukranian Stallion) Pushkin
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
More information about the Snort-users