[Snort-users] American laws on compromised server legal respo nsibilities
MCessna at ...3439...
Mon Jan 28 06:49:11 EST 2002
A thread of this topic was on the firewalls list last summer. After a lot of
back and forth posting it seems that no one knows. The best topic was that
of a conviction through negligence, the analogy given was that if you leave
your car unlocked and the keys in it and someone steals it and commits a
crime, then since you were negligent in securing your car you were liable in
part for the crime committed, how much liability you carry was not
discussed. Try searching the firewalls at ...4705..., I'm pretty sure the
thread was from last summer.
Good luck with this thorny issue,
From: Ian Masters [mailto:ian at ...4311...]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:04 PM
To: snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Snort-users] American laws on compromised server legal
This may be a little off topic, but I think it might apply to many users of
Do any of our USA list members know if there are any American laws directly
pertinent to the legal responsibilities of the owner of a server that has
been compromised and used to attack a third party.
It looks to me as though even under Tort law it would be difficult to bring
a case, where there is no contract between the the owner of the damaged
server and the owner of the compromised server.
If anyone has any information to the contrary, I'd be very grateful to hear
about it. If you're able to point me in the direction of any resources I'd
also be very grateful. The only documents of any use I've been able to find
and the legal section generally:
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
Snort-users list archive:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-users