[Snort-users] Bad Priority Setting

J. J. Horner jhorner at ...4499...
Tue Jan 8 09:25:04 EST 2002


I've looked at the FAQ and in the archives back a month or so and I 
can't find an answer to this:

I'm getting a great deal of entries in syslog reporting a lot of 
the snort-current rules as having a Bad Priority setting.  Am I missing
something in my configuration or is this somewhat normal?

Thanks
JJ

-- 
J. J. Horner
"H*","6a686f726e657240326a6e6574776f726b732e636f6d"
***************************************************
"H*","6a6a686f726e65724062656c6c736f7574682e6e6574"

Freedom is an all-or-nothing proposition:  either we 
are completely free, or we are subjects of a
tyrannical system.  If we lose one freedom in a
thousand, we become completely subjugated.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-users/attachments/20020108/604f37ba/attachment.sig>


More information about the Snort-users mailing list