[Snort-users] barnyard-0.1.0beta4

bthaler at ...2720... bthaler at ...2720...
Fri Feb 22 07:14:22 EST 2002

Thanks Steve, that's exactly the information I was looking for.

The regular Snort tables do exist in both Acid and Demarc, so it should be fine.

Developers, you should consider changing the plugin name so as not to confuse weenies like me!

Thanks to all who helped.


Brad T. 
Technical Support 
WebStream Internet Solutions

brad at ...2720...
(888) 932-2333 Toll-Free 
(954) 730-7127 Local 
(954) 733-7067 Fax 
(954) 730-7405 Help Desk

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

This communication contains proprietary business information and 
may contain confidential information. If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent 
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately destroy, discard, 
or erase this communication.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Halligan" <agent33 at ...187...>
To: <bthaler at ...2720...>; <snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <cmg at ...671...>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] barnyard-0.1.0beta4

> The Barnyard DB plugin uses the exact same DB structure as the Snort
> Database output plugin.  The fact that Barnyard calls it the "Acid" DB
> plugin is kind of a misnomer.  So (and I know nothing about Demarc) if
> Demarc uses the database structure that snort uses with its DB plugin, then
> it is 100% compatible.  The Acid specific tables (acid_event et al.) are not
> touched by Barnyard.
> >If, by "There are probably a few quirks but its the same 
> >format" you're referring to the incompatible database schemas 
> >in use, then
> >yes, it's the same.
> >
> >Demarc uses a different database structure than Acid.

More information about the Snort-users mailing list