[Snort-users] Snort rule triggered an alert, but why?
cmg at ...1935...
Thu Dec 5 13:11:05 EST 2002
C.Prickaerts at ...5294... writes:
> Hi Chris,
> But what was the attack ?
> The rule says it looks at repeated 43 content. But I failed to spot them in
> the dumplog.
It was a packet that went by that didn't match your homenet variable
but was already alerted on. Please try to reproduce it with current
Chris Green <cmg at ...1935...>
Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever.
More information about the Snort-users