[Snort-users] Configuration issue, Part II
erek at ...577...
Mon Sep 24 20:25:02 EDT 2001
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, DJDave Sobel wrote:
> This was the kicker -- I needed to run multiple instances of snort, one
> bound to each interface. Interestingly, it was defaulting to eth0,
> which was a "very secure" interface and was having everything blocked by
> Since I'm using snort to see everything that the firewall misses, this
> is now working great.
Great! Now we've perverted another user!! Wooo-Hooo! ;-P
More information about the Snort-users