[Snort-users] Configuring Cisco switches...
rstaaf at ...1457...
Fri Sep 21 07:38:04 EDT 2001
If he is so set against hubs his only other choice is to set up the
network monitoring port using span on the switch. I don't see any other way
to do it without putting snort on every box you want to monitor.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Childs" <bryan.childs at ...3120...>
To: "'Erek Adams'" <erek at ...577...>
Cc: <snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Configuring Cisco switches...
> Ok - after talking to my net admin chappy - he has another question, and I
> quote :
> "it would be better to ask of the best way to set up an ethernet network
> optimise your chances of capturing information whilst maintaining high
> performance switched networks"
> and he said to ignore any smart arses that suggested going back to using
> hubs :)
> Well ?
> Anyone got any good advice on this...
> On the face of it - turning on the port mirroring on the switch sounds
> it will do the job - but will anything suffer noticeably after we've done
> it? (Apart from the snort box, we're expecting that!)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erek Adams [mailto:erek at ...577...]
> > Sent: 21 September 2001 15:15
> > To: Bryan Childs
> > Cc: 'snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net'
> > Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Configuring Cisco switches...
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Bryan Childs wrote:
> > > Hi everyone - this question has probably been done to
> > death, but my google
> > > searching for answers has amounted to nought - so I'm going
> > to have to ask
> > > it again I'm afraid!
> > It's Ok, we'll just give you lashes with a wet noodle. ;-)
> > > The network here in my building is of course suffering from
> > the recent Nimda
> > > virus/worm breakout, and we're trying to track infected
> > boxes with snort.
> > >
> > > The entire network here is running on switched ethernet,
> > which is giving us
> > > a bit of a headache. Most of the switches are dumb 3Com
> > supplied ones, but
> > > we've been sensible enough (we think) to plug out snort box
> > into the Cisco
> > > one which sits at the top of the network.
> > >
> > > The trouble is that we *still* don't seem to be able to
> > monitor attacks
> > > which don't directly go for the snort box itself.
> > >
> > > The card is set up in promiscuous mode as it should be -
> > but we think we
> > > need to do something to the switch to make sure it sees ALL
> > our internal
> > > network traffic.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know what we might have missed? Or have any
> > suggestions at all?
> > Yeppers...
> > http://snort.sourcefire.com/docs/faq.html#1.8
> > Now, your Cisco _should_ be able to do that. If you don't
> > know talk with your
> > local netoworking geek. Bribe him with some wire ties or something...
> > > Cheers amigos......
> > Oh, you're bringing the beer? Great! Bring some Shinerbock. :)
> > -----
> > Erek Adams
> > Nifty-Type-Guy
> > TheAdamsFamily.Net
> Mercator - find out more at http://www.mercator.com
> The information in this email is confidential and is intended solely for
the addressee(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If
you are not an intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the
information contained in the email.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Mercator
> Email to and from Mercator may be monitored.
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> Snort-users list archive:
More information about the Snort-users