[Snort-users] FW: Two questions...
bwalder at ...3902...
Thu Oct 25 11:17:08 EDT 2001
From: snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:snort-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of J. C. Woods
Sent: 25 October 2001 18:34
To: snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] FW: Two questions...
Bob Walder wrote:
> Like I said - I am not Linux bashing - it is an excellent OS and I do not
> intend to be drawn into any further religious arguments.
> What I am saying - and probably a bit harshly initially, I admit, but I
> trying to rattle off a reply whilst extremely busy - is that OS choice
> should be strictly "horses for courses" not "my OS is better than your
> In our TESTING, we have proved FreeBSD 4.3 to be a more stable and better
> performing platform for Snort 1.8.1 than Red Hat Linux 7.1.
> That's all.
> Beyond that, YMMV
Ya, but, when I consider the theological significance implicit in your
argument, would I then be able to discern an ontological differentiation
between your choice and my choice?
J. Craig Woods
-Art is the illusion of spontaneity-
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
Snort-users list archive:
More information about the Snort-users