Robert D. Hughes
rob at ...1932...
Wed Nov 14 05:39:02 EST 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I disagree. Examine this with me, if you will: this person, using a |33+
email address, starts deriding the developers for being unprofessional.
Doesn't that strike you as at least a bit ironical? Further, doesn't it
cause you to question such a question's source? If not, why doesn't it?
If his email address had been joe.smith at ...131..., nothing would have
ever been said and I wouldn't have thought about it twice, other than
the troll factor already present after his initial comments.
- -----Original Message-----
From: Roberto Suarez Soto [mailto:robe at ...3881...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:00 AM
To: Snort-users (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Professionalism
On Nov/13, Robert D. Hughes wrote:
> Well, I can also ask the question "how professional is a person that
> uses an email address like shadowm4n at ...131...?". Second, your emails
That's a childish remark. If you're trying to make a serious
or mature comment, don't answer by attacking the one who asked. You say
he's trolling, but the fact is that he gives reasons to explain why he
the way he thinks, and you're not; so, you're the one trolling here.
My 0.02 cents, of course.
BTW, in my case I just found it funny at first the fact that
porn" had the same importance as "shellcode attack" (or alike), but just
commented that out and forgot about it.
Roberto Suarez Soto Alfa21
robe at ...3881...
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
Snort-users list archive:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2065 bytes
More information about the Snort-users