[Snort-users] Snort Performance Issues
dr at ...50...
Thu Aug 10 17:12:29 EDT 2000
Definitely bits.... Should read more carefully I guess. :-)
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Joe Magee wrote:
> > > > How much Data (Kb, Mb,etc) per second can snort handle without dropping
> > > > packets?
> > > I am thinking a good 100bt card (dec tulip 21143) and a reasonably fast
> > > CPU (K6/500,Duron,etc) should be able to handle 10 MBytes/sec of
> > > traffic. A lot of it will depend on how complex a ruleset you are using.
> > That configuration should be complete overkill for 10Mbps.
> > I've seen 233MMX boxes handle long saturated 10Mbps
> > bursts with a tulip and about 1500 rules. YMMV --dr
> Are you talking 10mega__BITS__ or 10mega__BYTES__?
> I was talking 10megaBYTES/sec. I doubt a 233MMX could handle saturated
> 100bt ethernet with 1500 rules.
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users at lists.sourceforge.net
dursec.com ltd. / kyx.net - we're from the future http://www.dursec.com
More information about the Snort-users