[Snort-sigs] Up and Running

Joel Esler jesler at ...435...
Tue Sep 11 13:04:35 EDT 2012


On Sep 11, 2012, at 1:02 PM, PR <oly562 at ...2420...> wrote:

> 4. only thing i see complaining so far was the ipvar option for
> 192.168.1.0/24, and the No White/Black_list.rules that are there.
> maybe perms or chown needed on rules dir?

What complained about the ipvar option for HOME_NET?

But, white and black list rules are not in our standard ruleset at this time.

--
Joel Esler
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager
Sourcefire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.snort.org/pipermail/snort-sigs/attachments/20120911/2ec0d3ed/attachment.html>


More information about the Snort-sigs mailing list