[Snort-sigs] [Emerging-Sigs] No real performance penalty?
jesler at ...435...
Wed Jan 11 10:36:29 EST 2012
On Jan 11, 2012, at 6:30 AM, elof at ...1288... wrote:
> Now, the main workload here is the Fast Pattern matching.
> The test to see if the packet is actually coming from src port 23 is only
> matched on the very few tcp packets that actually contain the pattern
> "login incorrect".
> Have I got it right, or is there a major reason why I should not choose to
> turn the telnet only rule into a general rule?
False positives and alert generation.
You'd be dealing with a ton of alerts instead of only ones on port 23.
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-sigs