[Snort-sigs] [Emerging-Sigs] New Classification System Proposal
jesler at ...435...
Thu Dec 23 14:39:10 EST 2010
On Dec 23, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Victor Julien wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 08:25 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
>> (Apologize in advance for cross-posting)
>> Have some news to share from our side.
>> After discussion internally, we (Sourcefire) also like this format and are going to update the official shipping snort.conf and the VRT rule sets to it as well. We are creating a bug internally to do this, as we speak.
>> Just a couple items however:
>> 1. We've already started writing the new classification.conf file (with new priorities and descriptions). If you have started on this, we'll be glad to use it, but we'll keep writing until we are told differently.
>> 2. We don't use "_", so we'll translate those over to "-".
>> 3. We also don't use uppercase in the keywords, so we'll translate those to lower case.
>> For example: Exploit-SQL_Injection will become exploit-sql-injection
>> I don't have a particular version of when we'll move over to the new format, but I'll be sure and keep the community updated as we move along this course on the blog (http://blog.snort.org) and the VRT blog (http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com).
> Hi Joel, how do you feel about having multiple classifications per
> signature? Like sort of using classifications as "tags"?
It's an interesting idea. I'll bring it up. Thanks Victor.
More information about the Snort-sigs