[Snort-sigs] Thread hijack to annoy Nigel

Jason security at ...704...
Tue Apr 15 17:30:33 EDT 2008

I wish I could see what you wrote, it seems that it is lost in the 
bottom some place between some message and some advertisement. Of 
course, if I wanted to hunt for your reply and then re read the entire 
thread to know where it applies it might make sense.

Jeff Nathan wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:09 PM, CunningPike wrote:
>> Top posting FTW! Why people want to scroll past all the stuff they
>> already read is beyond me.
>> IMHO, the list config sucks - you have to hit 'Reply all' to get the
>> reply to actually go to the list. Hitting 'Reply' sends the reply  
>> to the
>> OP only - defeating the point of the list.
>> CP
>> Nigel Houghton wrote:
>>> On  0, Matt Jonkman <jonkman at ...829...> wrote:
>>>> Also top posting to annoy Nigel.
>>> You all suck.
>>> You also all suck for hitting "reply all" to a mailing list, I'm  
>>> on the
>>> damn list, I get the email when it hits the list. You're all going to
>>> make me get out the "mailing list etiquette" speech aren't you?
>>> All hail mutt, use the "hooks" Luke.
> Borrowing from Guillaume Lovet's signature:
> A: yes.
> Q: are you sure?
> A: because it messes with the logical flow of conversation.
> Q: why is top-posting bad?
> -Jeff

This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs at lists.sourceforge.net

More information about the Snort-sigs mailing list