[Snort-sigs] False negatives on "ATTACK-RESPONSES id check returned userid"
celzinga at ...2420...
Fri May 4 03:45:09 EDT 2007
Looks good to me!
On 4/16/07, Jon Hart <jhart at ...288...> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 12:40:27PM +0200, Cees wrote:
> > Some additional information:
> > Version of snort used: 18.104.22.168
> > Snort.conf configuration:
> > var HOME_NET [192.168.247.133/32]
> > var EXTERNAL_NET !$HOME_NET
> > [..]
> > Preprocessors: frag3, stream4, http_inspect
> > Command-line options when starting snort:
> > snort -u snort -r uid.pcap -l log/ -c snort.conf
> > Operating system used: Gentoo linux
> > Attached a sample PCAP file. A client (192.168.247.129) retrieves a
> > from the server (192.168.247.133) with the string "uid=33(www-data)
> > gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data)".
> I seem to recall discussion about this rule and its potential for
> false-negatives sometime in the past. The further you crank out
> 'within', the greater the chance of a false-positive. There is
> definitely room for improvement, IMO, as uid and gid combinations that
> are greather than 9 characters in length are quite common.
> Why not pcre for this rule? 'pcre:/uid=\d+\S+\s+gid=\d+\S+'?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Snort-sigs