[Snort-sigs] Shouldn't all chat.rules be "policy violation"?

Brian bmc at ...95...
Mon Mar 15 05:56:23 EST 2004

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:26:31PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> Is there a reason why *some* of the CHAT rules are classified as "Potential
> Corporate Privacy Violation", and others as "Misc activity",etc?
> It seems to me that if you are going to classify  "CHAT MSN login attempt"
> as a policy issue, then "CHAT MSN message" is in the same camp...

Yep.  I'll fix that the next time I do a push.


More information about the Snort-sigs mailing list