[Snort-sigs] rule possibly misfiring
cmg at ...435...
Tue Jan 28 08:10:05 EST 2003
"Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl at ...361...> writes:
> Yeah, same here.... could spo_database have injected the wrong data
I can see this problem happening on B29. On Build 49 it should work
Did the packet that I create match what spo_database logged from a
Chris Green <cmg at ...435...>
Let not the sands of time get in your lunch.
More information about the Snort-sigs