[Snort-sigs] Did anyone else notice...?
roesch at ...435...
Sun Jun 16 18:58:02 EDT 2002
I sent an email to Chris Klaus and Robert Graham outlining the usage of the
SID system, I'll see if we get a response from them. It's important that
they respect the numbering system so that we don't have collisions and
adversely affect tools designed to interoperate with Snort.
On 6/14/02 6:15 PM, "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell at ...249...> wrote:
> Interesting.. they bash snort, and a year later say 'we are better because
> we can use snort sigs'..
> Standard User Defined Signatures . In addition to its advanced analysis
> engine,... now has the ability to import most of
> the published rules from Snort, an open-source intrusion detection system.
> Users can now take advantage of Internet Security Systems. X-Press
> Updates. and publicly posted open-source rules. This new feature also
> enables companies to leverage their experience with unsupported
> network-based intrusion detection systems and upgrade to a commercially
> available, fully supported family of protection products without new
> training for signature updates.
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
> Snort-sigs mailing list
> Snort-sigs at lists.sourceforge.net
Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO Sourcefire Inc. - (410) 290-1616
Sourcefire: Professional Snort Sensor and Management Console appliances
roesch at ...435... - http://www.sourcefire.com
Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org
More information about the Snort-sigs