[Snort-devel] Snort 2.4.3 perfmonitor not finishing log entries properly
steve.sturges at ...402...
Fri Mar 10 12:59:04 EST 2006
Yes, that would make better sense... We've seen folks who
prefer exit cleanly in production enviroments.
Might be worth moving that Sig Handler inside an #ifndef DEBUG,
so that when you compile with debug turned on, you'd get the
core file. Without related info (that is stripped or optimized
away when non-debug), core files are pretty tough to make
useful anyway. ;)
Dirk Geschke wrote:
> Hi Steven,
> do you think it is a good idea to add a singal handler for SIGSEGV?
> I guess it would be better to get a core file and fix the problem instead
> of ignoring it...
> Ok, you snort writes a message that he caught that signal but I think
> this signal handler should be better removed especially in a beta version...
> Best regards
More information about the Snort-devel