[Snort-devel] Current 2.0 and Sourcefire's Testing Methods

Matthew Callaway matt at ...807...
Mon Mar 24 10:42:30 EST 2003


Great, I'll look forward to it.

Matt

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Marc Norton wrote:

> Yes, we will do a paper on the subject soon.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: snort-devel-admin at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-devel-
> > admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Callaway
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:55 PM
> > To: snort-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Snort-devel] Current 2.0 and Sourcefire's Testing Methods
> >
> >   Also, what do you think about publishing Sourcefire's methodologies
> > for testing snort's performance.  That is, there are various metrics
> > given for each Sourcefire platform, "This box can handle 20 Mbits,
> while
> > this box can handle 100 Mbits" etc.  I'm curious how you arrive at
> these
> > numbers.  There are many archived discussions regarding testing
> snort's
> > performance, I'm wondering what Sourcefire does.  My thought is that
> we
> > all might benefit from open discussion of your performance testing.
> >
> > Your thoughts?
> >
> > Matt




More information about the Snort-devel mailing list