[attwell at ...277...: Re: [Snort-devel] Seg fault on startup ? snort-1.8beta4 Build 24]

Simon Attwell attwell at ...277...
Sun May 27 20:45:25 EDT 2001


Whoops...forgot to cc the list...

	- Simon

----- Forwarded message from Simon Attwell <attwell at ...277...> -----

Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:21:45 -0500
From: Simon Attwell <attwell at ...277...>
To: Fyodor <fygrave at ...1...>
Subject: Re: [Snort-devel] Seg fault on startup ? snort-1.8beta4 Build 24
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010528033919.U264 at ...1...>; from fygrave at ...1... on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 03:39:19AM +0700

Scuse my foolish brain :)

i meant to include it but they played the tomb raider trailer as i was composing that email

	- Simon

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
IntegrityCheck (rtn_head=0x80ad9d8, rulename=0x80ab170 "alert", listname=0x807c520 "TCP Chains")
    at rules.c:4100
4100	                ofl_idx = ofl_idx->next;
(gdb) backtrace
#0  IntegrityCheck (rtn_head=0x80ad9d8, rulename=0x80ab170 "alert", 
    listname=0x807c520 "TCP Chains") at rules.c:4100
#1  0x8051893 in IntegrityCheckRules () at rules.c:385
#2  0x80516ce in ParseRulesFile (file=0x80910a8 "/usr/local/snort/rules/snort.conf", inclevel=0)
    at rules.c:252
#3  0x804a291 in main (argc=7, argv=0xbffffa74) at snort.c:306
#4  0x40060577 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6


On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 03:39:19AM +0700, Fyodor wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:02:54PM -0500, Simon Attwell wrote:
> > Just updated to the latest cvs version of snort
> > using the latest ruleset from cvs
> > 
> > Get a seg fault on startup
> > 
> 
> 
> can we have gdb stack backtrace too? :-)

----- End forwarded message -----




More information about the Snort-devel mailing list