[Snort-devel] Defeating the anti-IDS tools...

Todd Lewis tlewis at ...255...
Thu Apr 5 01:04:00 EDT 2001

On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 agetchel at ...358... wrote:

> I guess, from my
> point of view, I'm just not hearing any good reasons _not_ to include a
> postprocessor such as this into Snort.

As long as its use is optional and it imposes no cost on sites that
don't use it, then probably no one will object to its being written
and included.  He who writes the code makes the rules, so show us what
you've got.

Todd Lewis
tlewis at ...255...

More information about the Snort-devel mailing list